Amid an intense military and media escalation between Tehran and Washington, US President Donald Trump issued a lengthy statement on his Truth Social platform, throwing a heavy stone into the waters of what can be described as an ongoing “information war”.
Trump did not limit himself to accusing Iran of fabricating its battlefield victories using artificial intelligence. He went further, accusing major American media institutions of “collusion and treason”.
However, a careful review of these allegations reveals a far more complex picture, where battlefield realities mix with digital rumours, and where the spectre of artificial intelligence is used as a political tool in internal disputes.
Breaking down the rhetoric also reveals that a significant portion of these accusations relies on conflating documented information with content circulating on social media platforms, in addition to the use of political discourse targeting domestic media outlets as much as it targets an external adversary.
Trump’s Source Fallacy
One of the most controversial points in Trump’s statement was his accusation that several media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, had published reports claiming that five US aerial refuelling aircraft had been shot down during the ongoing confrontation.
Yet a review of the newspaper’s recent reports shows no article confirming the downing of such aircraft. The newspaper has reported on military movements and regional tensions, but it has not published information confirming these alleged losses.
Trump also accused Iran of using artificial intelligence technologies to produce footage showing a US aircraft carrier burning at sea.
The spokesperson for the Iranian armed forces had previously stated: “We have taken the American aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln out of service, and it fled the battlefield”.
While Iran does at times exaggerate its capabilities, it did not officially publish footage of the carrier burning through its military platforms. The images instead circulated through unofficial propaganda accounts, a distinction ignored in Trump’s remarks as he attempted to link professional media coverage with what he described as “fake news”.
Denying Iranian Military Reality
Another point that generated controversy was Trump’s description of Iranian fast attack boats as “imaginary”, claiming they exist only in the realm of speculation.
In reality, American military reports for years have indicated that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps relies on what is known as the “fast boat swarm tactic” within its naval doctrine. This approach involves deploying large numbers of small, armed vessels to harass larger ships in the Gulf.
The US Central Command has published footage of targeting such boats in the Arabian Gulf during recent operations.
Officials within the US Department of Defense have repeatedly warned about this tactic, which is known in military literature as “naval guerrilla warfare”. For this reason, denying the existence of such capabilities entirely oversimplifies the complex military balance in the region.
When the External Enemy Becomes a Tool Against the Domestic Front
Although Trump’s statement appeared outwardly focused on Iran, a large portion of his rhetoric targeted American media outlets that he has described for years as “fake news”, most recently attacking an ABC correspondent.
In his remarks, Trump linked what he described as Iranian disinformation with the coverage of certain American media organisations, claiming that they contribute to spreading inaccurate narratives about the war.
He went even further by calling for a review of the broadcasting licences of some media institutions by the Federal Communications Commission.
Political Rhetoric in a Polarised Environment
Trump’s statement comes within the context of a highly polarised domestic political climate in the United States, where the relationship between some politicians and the media has become a central issue in election campaigns and public debates.
Throughout his years of political activity, Trump has frequently used sharply critical language toward major media institutions such as CNN and The New York Times, accusing them of distorting facts or demonstrating political bias.
However, his call to pursue media organisations on charges of “treason” for publishing incorrect information represents an unusual escalation. US law sets extremely strict standards for defining treason, and it typically does not include journalistic errors or inaccurate reporting.
Your funding keeps this voice independent.
