A source from the Resistance in Gaza told Al Mayadeen that the main consideration in the positive response the Resistance has given to the Paris Document is the needs of the people of Gaza, the West Bank, and occupied al-Quds, as well as those of the Resistance groups and their supporters in the region.
The source also affirmed that a positive response does not mean that the Resistance is weakened or has lost its fighting power, on the contrary, it possesses all the human and military components necessary for resistant combat, for as long as it’s needed.
The source also noted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s obstinate stance, and the compliance of the United States, will not bring the occupation any achievement in the field, and warned that the occupation ‘Zionist’ soldiers will continue bleeding until they completely withdraw from Gaza.
Over the past six days, the Israeli occupation forces have experienced fierce, detrimental blows in south Gaza and Khan Younis, the source revealed, stressing that more attacks should be expected in the following days.
The source also denied claims made by senior Israeli officials of the discovery of tunnels and storage facilities used to stock the Resistance’s arsenal, affirming that it was just a ploy to veil the occupation’s clear intel and security failure.
Hamas responds to mediators’ proposal, insists on full ceasefire
This comes after Hamas delivered on Tuesday its response to both Qatar and Egypt regarding the framework agreement, following internal consultations within its leadership and with other Palestinian Resistance factions.
Hamas explained that the response aims to achieve “a comprehensive and full ceasefire,” a clause that was not included in the original proposal.
According to the movement, the submitted response maintained the necessity of “a comprehensive and complete ceasefire, ending the aggression against [the Palestinian people], securing relief, shelter, reconstruction (projects), lifting the siege on the Gaza Strip, and completing the process of a prisoner exchange [deal].”
