It was not an ordinary appearance for the detained Saudi Khaled Al-Mawlid, affiliated with the Wahhabi religion, with the journalist Daoud Al-Sharyan on the MBC screen, who is accused of terrorism-related cases. This interview made it twisted as it appeared how he has the characteristics of a complete Wahhabi, devoid of life terrains that lead to the path on which the Mawlid traveled in its various stations.
A Saudi young man, of common people, was born in a holy city a few meters from the tomb of the Prophet, to a father who worked as watering pilgrims and visitors to Medina, to work with his father in a profession closer to the religious ritual than to a job, and to cross the tunnels of drugs and jihad, and then an apprentice at the hands of the Wahhabi sheikhs there until he reaches a conviction that the Prophet’s tomb must be demolished.
It was not difficult for al-Sherman to host al-Mawlid, who was imprisoned by the Saudi authorities, but the difficulty was getting a prisoner to speak freely, giving it to himself, without fear of being held accountable, and this is what al-Mawlid did. He supported his ideas with Wahhabi reasons and evidence, and he did not hesitate to say that he considers the Sharyan itself an infidel and that he must first repent, if he repents, and if he does not repent, he must be killed without controversy. How are you going to kill me?” Al-Mawlid said, “With bullets, or with a knife, or with whatever is easy, and if nothing is possible, then suffocate.”
The appearance of the Mawlid on the screen during the past few days has sparked widespread controversy in the Saudi arena. A group of commentators considered him to be just a mental patient who speaks without calculations or mental limits, while another group considered him more dangerous than just psychologically disturbed, as confirmed by Saudi psychiatry consultant Tariq Al-Habib in his tweets on Twitter, which added that the Mawlid “is not mentally ill in his assessment, even if his condition is more dangerous than mental illness.”
So that the question that opened its gateway to the Sharyab in his dialogue with Al-Mawlid remains, do the elements of al-Qaeda and ISIS spring from within myself? Or does the Wahhabi intellectual style that they follow in itself require psychological involvement close to disorder?
The true value of what Khaled al-Mawlid said, is not in his personal opinions, nor in his life path, but rather in the Wahhabi thought that stems from it, and about which he explicitly said that it is a thought that views the state of Islamic societies today as a feudal society, and therefore this requires those in charge of the matter In it, that sedition and return to the truth, or succumb to the rule of jihad, and jihad will be with killing, which is justified about the birth, for “fitnah is more severe than killing.” Therefore, Khaled al-Mawled appealed to the wise to move and advise the state, before the declaration of jihad against the state And then, he said, blood would flow to the knees.
As long as religious institutes and legal colleges in the Gulf in general, and in Saudi Arabia in particular, study and teach the Wahhabi curriculum, which talks about the necessity of embracing the ideas of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Ibn Taymiyyah, and about the governance of the victor, and all kinds of atonement, and anthropomorphism, the number of believers in this thought will continue to increase, without If it enables security to take note of the matter, or under the slogan of fighting terrorism, the pressure will increase their reactions, and they are already feeding on the oppressed in their view, and thus we enter into a sustainable cycle of violence and counter-violence that ignites the other every time.
