The Blueprint Behind the Bloodshed: Exposing the Religious and Strategic Vision of ‘Greater Israel’

For decades, the world has watched Middle Eastern borders shift, regimes fall, and societies fragment — often without connecting the deeper, more uncomfortable truth: these events do not unfold randomly. They align, disturbingly well, with a geopolitical and theological vision known to many as the project of “Greater Israel.”

This is not a conspiracy theory whispered in dark corners of the internet. It is a doctrine rooted in sacred texts, strategic policy documents, and even leaked diplomatic cables. It combines the religious convictions of radical Zionist interpretations with the secular ambitions of globalist engineering — and its effects are written in the blood of the region.

A Promise Drawn in Blood: Torah and Talmudic Foundations

The earliest articulation of the Greater Israel vision comes from the Torah itself. In Genesis 15:18, God declares to Abraham:

“To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”

This “divine grant” has been invoked time and again by religious Zionists as justification for territorial expansion — not just within the pre-1967 borders of the modern Israeli state, but across swathes of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and even parts of Saudi Arabia.

While many Jewish theologians interpret this verse spiritually or metaphorically, hardline settlers and nationalist parties read it literally — as a religious obligation to reclaim all the land between the Nile and Euphrates.

The Babylonian Talmud adds an unsettling layer of supremacist theology to this vision. In Tractate Soferim 15:10, it is written:

“Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.”

Sanhedrin 57a asserts that a Jew is not liable if he kills a non-Jew, and Baba Kamma 113a permits deception and theft from Gentiles under certain interpretations. In the Zohar, Arabs are described as “donkeys of the Messiah,” whose role is to serve the Jewish people.

Such texts, though controversial even within Jewish communities, continue to inspire the ideological underpinnings of Israeli settler movements and radical religious parties that view Palestinians as obstacles to prophecy.

These beliefs are not confined to synagogue walls. They bleed into Israeli politics, urban planning, military conduct, and public education. The 2023 statement by Israeli Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir — “My right to life comes before their right to move freely” — echoes a worldview rooted not only in colonialism, but in messianic entitlement.

The Yinon Plan: Fracture and Rule

In 1982, Israeli strategist Oded Yinon published a now-infamous paper titled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s.” In it, Yinon argued that the survival of Israel depended on the fragmentation of neighboring Arab states along ethnic and sectarian lines.

Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon — all were to be split into smaller, weaker entities. Sectarian civil war, tribal division, and economic collapse were not threats to Israeli security — they were tools of it.

Yinon’s vision was chillingly prescient. Over the next three decades, U.S.-led wars and domestic uprisings (many backed by external funding and covert operations) dismantled much of the Arab political order:

• • Iraq fractured into Kurdish, Sunni, and Shia zones.

• • Syria became a proxy battleground for global powers.

• • Libya collapsed into tribal anarchy.

• • Sudan split in two.

While these events were officially justified through discourses of democracy and humanitarian intervention, their geopolitical outcome aligned closely with Yinon’s blueprint: the weakening of Arab resistance and the uncontested rise of Israel as the region’s hegemon.

Freemasonry and the Myth of Chaos

Beyond theology and statecraft lies a darker current — one that fuses the esoteric visions of Freemasonry with the material ambitions of Zionism. In 1871, Confederate general and high-degree Freemason Albert Pike allegedly outlined a plan for three world wars in a letter preserved by the British Museum (its authenticity debated but its content uncannily echoed by history):

• • The first war would destroy Tsarist Russia and birth Communism.

• • The second would destroy Fascism and establish Zionism.

• • The third would be a clash between political Zionism and Islam, leading to global exhaustion and the unveiling of a Luciferian world order.

This triadic vision, whether symbolic or operational, appears to synchronise with real-world developments — especially the manufactured conflicts across the Islamic world that systematically erode its unity, independence, and credibility.

Freemasonry’s motto — Ordo ab Chao (“Order out of Chaos”) — finds a startling resonance in the Middle East. Every time chaos erupts — whether in Baghdad, Damascus, or Khartoum — a new layer of geopolitical restructuring emerges, almost always to Israel’s strategic advantage.

Moreover, masonic symbolism and ideology have appeared in the development of futuristic regional megaprojects, most notably Saudi Arabia’s NEOM — a planned smart city with distinctly post-Islamic branding, built with Israeli partnerships and openly championed by Western globalist institutions.

WikiLeaks, Gaza, and the Policy of Containment

In 2008, a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable (08TELAVIV2447_a), published by WikiLeaks, exposed Israel’s strategy of keeping Gaza’s economy “on the brink of collapse.” Israeli officials, according to the cable, explained to U.S. counterparts that they intended to permit just enough goods into Gaza to prevent outright famine — but not enough to allow for real development or dignity.

This is not a strategy of war. It is a strategy of siege.

The vision of Greater Israel requires more than territory. It demands that the Palestinian population be reduced — if not physically, then economically, politically, and psychologically.

Other leaks have revealed covert cooperation between Gulf states and Israel, long before public normalization. Shared intelligence, silent airspace agreements, and backchannel deals revealed the complicity of those who now openly finance “peace” projects — while Jerusalem is steadily de-Palestinianised.

Conclusion: The Dream They Kill For

Greater Israel is not a fringe delusion. It is a doctrine. A script. A sacred and strategic roadmap supported by scripture, strategists, and silence.

Its execution requires religious absolutism, regional destabilization, elite collusion, and global distraction. And while many of its architects drape it in the language of security, development, and coexistence — its real outcome is apartheid, occupation, and blood.

And yet, the Qur’an warned us:

“They will not cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion — if they are able.” — Qur’an 2:217

And again: “Indeed, they plan, but Allah plans. And Allah is the best of planners.” — Qur’an 8:30

In the age of maps drawn by prophecy and borders enforced by drones, the greatest resistance is truth. And the greatest threat to their plan — is a Muslim world that sees.

Found benefit? Help keep it going. We rely on Allah—and your support.

Click here to Donate

⚠️ Disclaimer: This article critiques political ideologies and theological doctrines that underpin oppression, apartheid, and betrayal. It does not target individuals based onrace or ethnicity. Islam upholds justice, and we oppose all forms of racism and conspiracy-driven hate. The aim is truth, accountability, and awakening.